Why War?
why-war.com
Please make a donation to keep this site alive.
-- We need only $30/month to stay online.

'Dirty Bomb' Detainee a 'Small Fish'

Christopher Newton | Associated Press | August 13, 2002

"An American touted by Attorney General John Ashcroft as a significant terrorism figure with plans to detonate a radioactive bomb is probably a 'small fish' with no ties to al-Qaida cell members in the United States, law enforcement officials say."

An American touted by Attorney General John Ashcroft as a significant terrorism figure with plans to detonate a radioactive bomb is probably a "small fish" with no ties to al-Qaida cell members in the United States, law enforcement officials say.

The FBI's investigation has produced no evidence that Jose Padilla had begun preparations for an attack and little reason to believe he had any support from al-Qaida to direct such a plot, said one of the officials, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The official said Padilla is a "small fish" in the terrorism investigation, but someone who authorities still believe warrants being detained.

Padilla, 31, is being held in a military brig in South Carolina as an enemy combatant, a legal designation allowing the government to jail him without formal criminal charges. His attorney has argued in court that he is being held illegally and should be released.

Investigators have said they believe that Padilla, a Muslim convert and a former Chicago gang member, ventured overseas in search of clerics connected to the most radical branch of Islamic fundamentalism.

In early June, Ashcroft announced from Moscow via satel lite hookup that Padilla had been arrested at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago. Ashcroft's deputies also convened a news conference in Washington.

"We have disrupted an unfolding ter rorist plot to attack the United States by exploding a radioactive dirty bomb," Ashcroft said, adding that the government's suspicions about Padilla's plans came from "multiple, independent, corroborating sources."

Now, two law-enforcement officials close to the case say there is no evidence that a plot was under way. One had been "thought out as a possibility," an official said.

Padilla's attorney, Donna Newman, said the government was avoiding a court case because it has little evidence against him.

"What we could analyze from government statements is that they didn't have sufficient evidence to charge him," Newman said.

www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/xml/story.ssf/html_standard.xsl?/bE-mail this article
This website is a tribute to Why War?, one of the nation's first and most innovative post-9/11 student antiwar organizations. Born on October 22, 2001 at Swarthmore College, we were a handful of freshmen and sophmores who vocally opposed the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere. And now, seven years later, we are retiring this website as we focus our efforts on new directions. We hope that it continues to serve future activists and we remain confident that humanity is on the verge birthing a better world.