Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/whywar/news.inc:287) in /home/whywar/public_html/ssi/head.ssi on line 4
 
Why War?
why-war.com
Why War?'s newest project:
Post-Democracy
Sort By:  

Brendan O'Neill

Creating the Enemy

Brendan O'Neill | Spiked | March 22, 2004

"The impact that terrorism has on society is determined by the authorities under target and how they deal with the threat, rather than by the terrorists' outrages." [more]

What Kind of Anti-War Movement is This?

Brendan O'Neill | Christian Science Monitor | December 13, 2002

"Most of the new antiwar groups express an entirely personal opposition to war, one based more on moral revulsion than effective political opposition. Protesters voice a personal distaste for violent conflict, rather than organizing a collective stand against it." [more]

USUK ... Divided They Fight

Brendan O'Neill | American Prospect | June 27, 2002

"For all British and U.S. leaders' grand pronouncements of solidarity in the face of terrorism, the 'true friendship' between Bush and Blair seems to be in short supply at least between U.S. forces and Royal Marines in the hills of east Afghanistan. Indeed, while politicians at home talk about standing 'shoulder to shoulder,' their forces on the ground can barely see eye to eye." [more]

Analysis: When Nation-Building Destroys

Brendan O'Neill | Spiked | April 4, 2002

"So what is the state of post-Taliban Afghanistan? Is it a human rights triumph where freedoms have been regained, or just a mess? A security nightmare that needs heavy policing, or a state with some non-threatening security issues? One thing is certain: the Bush administration's contradictory statements about Afghanistan over the past two months show that US policy is driven less by concern for democracy and human rights, than by political expediency." [more]

Analysis: The strange battle of Shah-i-Kot

Brendan O'Neill | Spiked | March 22, 2002

"So what did happen to the al-Qaeda and Taliban forces in Shah-i-Kot? One report claimed that 'the absence ofÖany sign of the enemy, dead or alive, raised suspicions that many fighters had escaped before the offensive had begun [on 1 March]' (32). So those 3250 bombs might have been dropped on largely uninhabited territory that may have been vacated by the enemy two weeks previously? That wouldn't be a first for the Americans, who spent much of January bombing caves in the Zhawar Kili region of southern Afghanistan, even though most al-Qaeda members had left, in an attempt to 'destroy al-Qaeda's infrastructure'." [more]

1–5 of 5 records found matching your criteria.